Sandeep Nailwal, the co-founder of the Polygon Foundation, has denied allegations that wallets linked to the foundation were involved in a recent dump of MATIC on Binance. Nailwal’s denial came in response to a post on X by on-chain analytics platform, Lookonchain, showing that a wallet allegedly connected to Polygon had recently sold $3.35 million worth of MATIC on Binance, creating FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) in the community.
Earlier today, Nailwal took to X (Twitter) to dismiss Lookonchain’s report, asserting that the findings were “incorrect”. He claimed that this is not the first time Lookonchain has been guilty of sharing inaccurate information with its followers. Requesting the platform be vigilant to avoid any further unecessary FUD, Nailwal asked Lookonchain to be “careful about these tweets”.
One more time, incorrect labelling @lookonchain. This is the second time this has happened.
Plz be careful about these tweets 🙏🏼, creates unnecessary FUDs for the community https://t.co/mVpaIYB9Xt
— Sandeep Nailwal | sandeep. polygon 💜 (@sandeepnailwal) September 7, 2023
On September 7, Lookonchain shared a Twitter thread posing an alarming question, “Is Polygon selling MATIC?”. The thread shared that an address identified as “Polygon Foundation 0x8d36” had been involved in a transfer of 6 million MATIC, worth $3.35 million, to the prominent exchange Binance, over the past 48 hours. The thread also pointed out that another address marked as “Polygon Foundation 0xf957” had preiouvsly moved 4.6 million MATIC, worth $2.57 million to Binance, in a single month.
Dismissing Lookonchain’s association between Polygon and the MATIC selloff, Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon Labs, came forward to clarify that the addresses involved were not connected to Polygon. He tweeted that wallet has been “incorrectly labeled”, adding, “It is not a Polygon Foundation wallet”.
You have incorrectly labelled this wallet. It is not a Polygon Foundation wallet.
— Marc Boiron (@0xMarcB) September 7, 2023
Subsequently, Nailwal also pointed out the faulty findings of the Lookonchain, in an attempt to assure the community. Lookonchain responded by pointing out that the wallet addresses had been labeled by fellow on-chain crypto analytics tool, Nansen.
