In a tantalizing challenge for coders and blockchain enthusiasts worldwide, a whopping reward of $400,000 has been announced for anyone who can locate the code that can purportedly “turn off” the Solana network. The buzz surrounding this challenge has its roots in a recent court hearing that sent shockwaves through the crypto community.
The challenge stems from Caroline Ellison’s explosive testimony in the FTX court. Ellison claimed that Alameda had the capability to “turn off” the Solana blockchain, leading to the liquidation of users. Her statement raised eyebrows and questions, as the decentralized nature of blockchains makes them inherently resistant to any single point of control or failure.
Fyi there’s a $400k reward for anyone that can find code that can turn off Solana
Please go ahead and find ithttps://t.co/2oxcB0EEyx
— Jacob Creech (@jacobvcreech) October 12, 2023
Intrigued by the claim, an anonymous user delved into Solana’s code, sharing a screenshot on GitHub, implying there might be a function that allows someone to stop the network. However, upon closer inspection of the screenshot provided, it seems the identified functions do not possess the capability to turn off the network.
The shared code snippet showcases an asynchronous function that handles certain request types, notably one that matches the “stop” command. This function seems to be designed to halt the application upon receiving specific credentials. But this does not necessarily translate to shutting down the entire Solana network. Instead, it might be related to stopping a local instance or application tied to the Solana ecosystem.
It is essential to understand the distinction between shutting down a specific application within a blockchain and the potential to “turn off” an entire blockchain network. The decentralized nature of blockchains like Solana means that even if one node (or even several nodes) were to shut down, the network as a whole would continue to function. Thus, finding a function in the code that stops an application does not corroborate the bold claim made in the courtroom.
